Cambridge School
What is it?
It’s a way of looking at Indian history, especially the freedom struggle.
It was developed by some British historians from Cambridge University.
Main Idea:
They say the real conflict during British rule was not between Indians and the British.
Instead, the conflict was among Indians themselves – they were fighting for power and benefits from the British.
Their Argument:
Indian nationalism (the freedom struggle) was not about fighting British exploitation.
It was just a fight among Indian leaders to gain power and benefits from the British.
For example, leaders like those in the Congress were more interested in personal power than in freeing India.
Criticism of this Approach:
Many historians disagree with the Cambridge School.
They say this approach ignores the ideals and sacrifices of Indian leaders and people.
It reduces nationalism to just "animal politics" (fighting for power like animals), ignoring the ideals and emotions behind the freedom struggle.
Key Points to Remember:
Cambridge School says the freedom struggle was not about fighting the British but about Indians fighting each other for power and benefits.
It ignores the ideals and sacrifices of Indian leaders and people.
Many historians criticize this approach for being too simplistic and unfair